Fact sheet: Capping—sediments

From: Public Services and Procurement Canada

On this page

Description

Capping is a containment technology that isolates contaminated sediments from the surrounding aquatic environment using clean layers of geological material and/or synthetic liners. By isolating contaminated sediments and significantly reducing the process of sediment transport by water, capping rapidly eliminates exposure pathways between contaminants and the natural environment, thereby preventing contamination of the latter.

Conventional or in situ capping refers to capping materials that act as a passive barrier to sediments and water. Caps may be permeable, semipermeable or impermeable. The surface of the capping layer can also be designed to improve the ecological value of the substrate by providing habitat for native flora and fauna.

When capping is insufficient to manage the remediation objectives, amendments may be incorporated into the capping materials to improve their effectiveness, known as capping with amendments.

The capping approach is based on sediment immobilization, physical isolation between the sediments and the aquatic environment, and chemical isolation, which reduces chemical reactions and transfers between contaminants, pore water, and overlying water.

Internet links:

Implementation of the technology

Implementation of this technology may include:  

  • Mobilization, site access and installation of temporary facilities.
  • Capture and relocation of aquatic organisms and fauna, if possible, located in the rehabilitation area. See activities involving species at risk.
  • Evaluation of installation methods to minimize potential bioturbation by native biota.
  • Assessment of the site’s suitability for capping, including consideration of current and future uses.
  • Design of the cap, which may include various components, such as
    • stabilization of contaminated sediments to protect them from erosive forces through armouring (placement of gravel or stone), in an effort to prevent resuspension and transport of contaminants to other sites.
    • physical isolation of contaminated sediments to reduce interaction and contact with the benthic community, the primary means for contaminant transport and trophic transfer.
    • chemical isolation of contaminated sediments to reduce chemical reactions and transfer between contaminants, pore water, and overlying water. This reduces the risk of contaminant flux into the biologically active zone.
  • Preparation of the site for the cap installation, which may include dredging, in situ contaminant treatment, and habitat/species removal/relocation.
  • Implementation of a long-term monitoring and sampling program to assess the ongoing performance success and integrity of the cap, as well as the ecosystem’s recovery.
  • The use of vents to manage gaseous emissions in areas of significant organic decomposition, where gas build-up and effervescence can create cracks and fissures within the cap.
  • Site restoration (grading, revegetation, etc.).

Materials and Storage

Caps may be permeable, semipermeable, or impermeable. Options for overlay materials include clean sediments, silt, sand, or gravel, as well as impermeable materials such as clay. On-site storage may include these materials, as well as fuels, lubricants, amendments, and other site materials required for operating the machinery and equipment to implement the technology.

Specialized synthetic layers (such as geomembranes) can be used in combination with natural materials to increase cap effectiveness.

Geosynthetics are sometimes deployed over low-dispersion sediments to support the overlain capping materials. A protective armouring layer, often consisting of coarse material (gravel, stone) can be installed over the capping material (sand) to prevent the suspension and erosion of the capping layer in unstable areas (such as those vulnerable to erosion). These materials should be stockpiled and covered on-site to minimize dust and protect them from precipitation.

When vapour and/or water treatment components and treatment systems are incorporated into the cap, they may also be stored on-site.

Waste and Discharge

According to local waste disposal guidelines, excess capping materials can be reused or disposed of.

Soluble and buoyant capping materials and amendments may enter the water column during placement, causing increased loading in the water column and potential downstream migration. Resuspension of contaminants in the water column may occur during placement of the sediment cover. The timing of the remediation work should be selected to minimize migration.

Surface water run-off from unprotected materials may enter the waterbody (if storage has not been properly organized). Stockpiled material should be covered/contained, and potential run-off should be captured and treated prior to discharge.

Biodegradation of contaminants or organic matter, for example, may lead to off-gassing (such as carbon dioxide, ammonia and methane and/or hydrogen sulphide) under the cap. Vents should be included in cap designs to prevent gas releases into the environment, where potentially noxious gases are likely formed.

In addition, vapour discharge may be released from equipment exhaust or from the volatilization of contaminants from contaminated sediments in place prior to capping. Also, gaseous emissions from sediments containing high levels of organic matter content can cause odour issues. Workers who find themselves in the potential presence of odours or volatile compounds must take precautions to prevent gas emanations by monitoring concentrations, using adequate personal protective equipment and/or by conducting sediment capping work during colder temperatures.

Recommended analyses for detailed characterization

Chemical analysis

  • pH
  • Alkalinity
  • Contaminant concentrations present in the following phases:
    • adsorbed
    • dissolved
    • free
  • Nutrient concentrations including:
    • ammonia nitrogen
    • nitrates
    • nitrites
    • total phosphorus
    • potassium
  • Redox potential
  • Total dissolved solid
  • Dissolved oxygen
  • Groundwater geochemical parameters (pH, oxidation potential, dissolved oxygen, temperature)
  • Groundwater biodegradation indicators (dissolved oxygen, nitrate, sulfate, dissolved iron, methane)
  • Temperaturenull
  • Total Organic content in sediments and pore water
  • Electrical conductivity

Physical analysis

  • Presence of non-aqueous phase liquids (NAPLs)
  • Sediment water content
  • Sediment particle size distribution
  • Sediment geotechnical properties (bulk density, plasticity, shear strength and cohesion)
  • Total suspended solids

Hydrogeological Analysis

  • Bottom velocity
  • Bed stress
  • Gross sedimentation
  • Sediment core profiles
  • Sediment-water flux rates

Recommended trials for detailed characterization

Physical trials

  • Geotechnical laboratory tests to establish the behaviour of sediments and overburden materials

Other information recommended for detailed characterization

Phase II

  • Regional climatic conditions (precipitation, temperature, etc.)
  • Bathymetry
  • Characterization of the physical environment includes:
    • Size of the waterbody
    • Tidal infuence
    • Ice regime
    • Aquatic species
    • Presences of bridges
    • Proximity to land and/or maritime structures
  • Characterization of the present and proposed surface water usage and the water body in general (including the required draft for vessels)
  • Presence of above and below ground infrastructure
  • Nature of the contamination and the delineation of its extent
  • Erosion potential
  • Sediment deposition rate and transport
  • Characterization of biological processes that occur, or have occurred, at the site, likely to impact contaminants, as well as human and ecological receptors
  • Presence of known and potential receptors
  • Assessment of the biological conditions and ecological factors such as habitat vulnerability, presence of protected areas, presence of species at risk
  • Slope stability and load-bearing capacity
  • Capacity of sediments to support the load of overlying materials

Phase III

  • Identification of preferential pathways for contaminant migration
  • Characterization of the hydrogeological system including:
    • the hydraulic conductivity
    • the seasonal fluctuations
    • the hydraulic gradient
    • Groundwater and surface water flow direction
    • Currents, wave action and tidal profiles
    • Sediment permeability
    • Hydrostatic pressures
    • Water balance
    • Water column thickness
  • Geochemical and/or hydrogeological modeling if soils are reused on site
  • Risk assessment on identified sensitive receptors
  • Contaminant mass balance
  • Approximate volumes of contaminated sediment and water
  • Vapour survey

Applications

Capping applies to both organic and inorganic contaminants. This method has a high potential for success when the extent of contamination is well defined and at depths between 1.5 and 15 metres. Typically, capping is used when contaminants are present in the solid phase of sediments or when contaminants are adsorbed onto the solid phase. Capping could also be applied to control dissolved contamination in pore water and free-phase contamination (such as dense non-aqueous phase liquid). The demonstration work required for some types of contaminants can be complex and expensive.

Periodic inspections of the cap conditions and long-term monitoring are required to ensure the cap’s integrity and effectiveness.

Applications to sites in northern regions

  • The technology is applicable in northern environments, but remote sites have greater logistical challenges associated with mobilization, resulting in higher costs. In addition, equipment availability is limited and the seasonal windows to conduct work are short.
  • Arctic environments may require the assistance of an icebreaker, as well as monitoring and reporting of ice conditions, which considerably amplifies operational costs and organizational requirements.
  • Monitoring and testing are limited by timely access to certified laboratories, and often necessitate the development of on-site testing and analysis of materials or the implementation of progressive interventions and/or the implementation of a risk-based management approach.
  • The technology may require the placement of restrictions or limitations on the human consumption of native organisms when contaminated sediments are present. Because local people may rely on aquatic species as important food sources, these restrictions may significantly impact communities.
  • Shallow coastal areas in northern environments are also commonly affected by ice scouring from icebergs and sea ice, which is a limitation for the feasibility of capping. The effects of climate change are of relevance for long-term management of caps in northern sites, as design conditions may be altered, affecting the lifespan of the capping.

Treatment type

Treatment type
Treatment typeApplies or Does not apply
In situ
Applies
Ex situ
Does not apply
Biological
Does not exist
Chemical
Does not exist
Control
Applies
Dissolved contamination
Applies
Free Phase
Applies
Physical
Applies
Residual contamination
Applies
Resorption
Does not exist
Thermal
Does not exist

State of technology

State of technology
State of technologyExist or Does not exist
Testing
Exist
Commercialization
Exist

Target contaminants

Target contaminantsApplies, Does not apply or With restrictions
Aliphatic chlorinated hydrocarbons
Applies
Chlorobenzenes
Applies
Explosives
With restrictions
Metals
Applies
Monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
With restrictions
Non metalic inorganic compounds
Applies
Pesticides
Applies
Petroleum hydrocarbons
Applies
Phenolic compounds
With restrictions
Policyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
Applies
Polychlorinated biphenyls
Applies

Treatment time

Treatment time
Treatment timeApplies or Does not apply
Less than 1 year
Applies
1 to 3 years
Applies
3 to 5 years
Applies
More than 5 years
Applies

Notes:

The timeframe for installation typically ranges from one to four months. Frequent inspections are required for the first six months, the period in which cap failure is most likely to occur.

Long-term considerations (following remediation work)

Capping has relatively few adverse effects on the site, so there will be little or no long-term considerations. In addition, because contaminated sediments are left in place, capping does not require the treatment, transportation, and disposal of sediments, which is a significant advantage that reduces the environmental impacts of capping (such as greenhouse gases and energy requirements).

Most cap integrity failures occur within the first six months following cap placement. Post-placement, the natural environment will act on sediments and the capping materials, resulting in changes to the cap layers. Bioturbation, groundwater intrusion, contaminant migration, and erosion may all influence the success of the cap. Periodic events, such as floods or water-level changes, may also result in changes to the cap layers.

Implementing institutional controls (such as bans on dropping anchors or trawling within the capped area) may be necessary for capping success in locations where human activity is expected. Therefore, it is recommended to carry out annual checks of the physical integrity and a survey of the entire area every five years.

Secondary by-products and/or metabolites

Capping may induce anaerobic conditions in the sediments’ uppermost layer, resulting in methane and sulphide gas production beneath the cap. Anaerobic biodegradation of some compounds can generate hazardous by-products.

If sediments contain mercury, the capping conditions could transform it into methylmercury (Randall et al. 2013). Other chemicals contain hazardous metabolites and degradation by-products, such as tetrachloroethene (PCE), a common dry-cleaning substance, and dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), an insecticide commonly used before 1970.

One of the issues associated with gas production in sediments beneath the cap is the risk that this gas production will increase pore pressures and affect the integrity of the cap. As a result, cracks or fissures could form, compromising the stability of the cap and the release of contaminants into the environment.

Limitations and Undesirable Effects of the Technology

  • Capping is not appropriate in the following situations:
    • Locations where the contamination is not well delineated in all the contaminated media
    • Water depths of less than 1.5 metres, since capping would significantly alter the waterbody
    • Sites where infrastructure requirements (piers, piles, buried cables, etc.) and intended uses (navigation, flood control, etc.) are not compatible with capping
    • Site where groundwater resurgence is significant
    • Large tidal range (over 1 cm/day)
    • Presence of unexploded explosive ordnances (UXOs), which poses a risk of unintentional detonation
  • Capping is challenging under the following conditions:
    • Water depths greater than 15 metres, since conventional sand capping methods are ineffective, the use of specialized equipment may be considered
    • Rapid erosion of the waterbody
    • Physical site conditions (groundwater resurgence, potential for significant bioturbation, inability of original sediments to support weight of overburden, and access required to subsea structures)
    • Gas production below the cap requiring additional management measures
    • Extreme events (storms, floods and earthquakes), as well as ice jams and ice scouring, can compromise the stability of a sediment cap
  • Capping can have the following adverse effects:
    • Permanent or temporary loss of the benthic community
    • Modification of the characteristics of the waterway: reduction in navigable depth, restrictions on navigation and aquatic activities, flood-bearing capacity of a waterway
    • Permanent risk of contaminant transfer, re-exposure or disturbance of contaminated sediments since contaminants remain in place
    • Resuspension of sediments (clean or contaminated) during capping installation

Complementary technologies that improve treatment effectiveness

  • In Situ pretreatment of sediments
  • Dredging (highly contaminated or mobile areas)
  • Excavation (highly contaminated or mobile areas)
  • Capping with amendments

Capping with amendments is considered as a modified capping technology. It involves incorporating biological and/or chemical amendments into the overlay material. Modified capping employs the same reagents as biodegradation, sequestration and chemical oxidation, and can deliver improvements similar to those associated with in situ treatments. Examples of reagents include adsorbents (such as activated carbon), oxidants, reducers (such as zerovalent iron), nutrients or products that reduce the hydraulic conductivity of the capping material (such as bentonite or organophilic clays) and minimize contaminant transfer to bioturbation zones or the water column (ITRC 2014).

Required secondary treatments

Gas may be generated under the cap. Long-term secondary treatment may be considered to control gas emissions into the environment.

Application examples

Applications examples are available at these links:

Performance

The performance of capping varies depending on its design, sediment consolidation, advection, the additives used (if any), the specific characteristics of the site, and the type of contaminants present. Because of this, cap effectiveness relies on the suitability of the design and quality of the installation. Lifespans for capping projects are dependent on the type and quantity of contamination as well as contaminant fate and transport mechanisms operating within the cap. Experience has demonstrated that the predicted lifespan is in the order of decades.

Measures to improve sustainability or promote ecological remediation

  • Using renewable energy and energy-efficient equipment for technology implementation.
  • Reducing fuel consumption (and using renewable energy where available) for vehicles and heavy machinery.
  • Optimizing the scheduling to promote resource sharing and reduce the number of mobilization days.
  • Capturing and relocating the species at risk and sensitive habitats likely to be affected by rehabilitation work.
  • Working during periods of low risk to fish and fish habitat.
  • Identifying site-specific regulatory resources (for example, fishing licences), sensitivities, and appropriate avoidance/mitigation measures.
  • Using local borrow pits to supply capping materials.
  • Designing the cap to reduce the potential production of greenhouse gases in sediments underneath the cover.
  • Designing the cap to improve aquatic habitat quality (increase ecological value of the environment).
  • Using telemetry for remote monitoring of secondary treatments, if applicable, to reduce the number of field visits.
  • Using materials with the same composition and with similar characteristics as the native sediments to promote habitat recovery by living organisms.

Potential impacts of the application of the technology on human health

Potential Human Health Impacts

The minor and major potential human health exposure pathways are presented in the following table.

Exposure Pathway Triggers (Remediation Stages)

Residency or Transport Media

Public Exposure Routes (On-Site & Off-Site)

Monitoring

Mitigation Measures according to Residency or Transport Media

Site Preparation

Dust

Inhalation of Dust

Dust Monitoring

 Dust

  • Limit equipment speed.
  • Limit equipment movements during dry, windy periods.
  • Water mist on dry materials.
  • Cover stockpiles and use water and/or chemical amendments.
  • Mitigate effects as close to the source as possible.
  • Monitoring at the source, within installation limits and/or at receptor level.
  • Train personnel about safety and provide them with personal protective equipment and appropriate emergency equipment (such as eyewash stations).
  • Selection of nontoxic amendments, if possible.
  • Monitoring of measures in place for safe storage and handling to minimize exposure, as outlined in material safety data sheets.

Vapours

  • Limit open work and storage areas cover stockpiles.
  • Temporary emission control structures.
  • Monitoring gas levels if vents have been installed in the capping.
  • Capture vapours at source and treatment.
  • Wearing personal protective equipment (vapour protection mask).

Sediments

  • Vehicle cleaning station at the site exit.

Surface Water

  • Install fence, limit site use and signage.
  • Cover stockpiles.
  • Monitor sediment migration in surface water.
  • Collect and treat contaminated water.
  • Implement stormwater management plan. 

Groundwater

  • Institutional controls.
  • Water quality monitoring outside the containment zone.

Animals and Plants

  • Wash food before consumption.
  • Do not irrigate or use treated water for irrigation.
  • Stakeholder engagement.
  • Install fence, limit site use and signage.
  • Fences, site use restrictions and signage.
  • Institutional controls.

Vapours

Inhalation of Vapours

Air Quality Monitoring

 

Capping

Stockpiling

Dust

Inhalation of Dust

Dust Monitoring

Vapours

Inhalation of Vapours

Air Quality Monitoring

Emissions Monitoring and Critical Thresholds

Groundwater

(contaminated by sediments)

Ingestion of Drinking Water

Country Foods Consumption

Groundwater Monitoring

Surface Water

(contaminated by sediments)

Ingestion of Drinking Water

Dermal Contact

Country Foods Consumption

Wastewater Monitoring

Surface Water Monitoring

Capping Material Inspection

Sediments

Incidental Ingestion

Dermal Contact

Surface Water Monitoring

Capping Material Inspection

Animals and Plants

(including fish, shellfish and wildlife)

Country Foods Consumption

Dust Monitoring

Surface Water Monitoring

Animal and Plant Tissue Monitoring

Monitoring and Testing of Sediments

Vapour Collection and Treatment

Vapours

Inhalation of Vapours

Air Quality Monitoring

Emissions Monitoring and Critical Thresholds

Monitoring

Vapours

(Gas emission underneath capping)

Inhalation of Vapours

Air Quality Monitoring

Emissions Monitoring and Critical Thresholds

Surface Water

(Capping Integrity/contaminant transport)

Ingestion of Drinking Water

Dermal Contact

Country Foods Consumption

Wastewater Monitoring

Surface Water Monitoring

Capping Material Inspection

Animal and Plant Tissue Monitoring

Potential Aquatic Impacts

Sediment capping can lead to changes in nutrient availability and habitat conditions for aquatic species. Changes in geochemical conditions (salinity, dissolved oxygen, and temperature) can also occur. These changes can negatively impact aquatic species and result in their displacement or increase in mortality.

Activities and stressors associated with capping contaminated sediments that may impact fish and fish habitats include placing material or aquatic structures, removing aquatic vegetation, modifying flow, altering fish passage and managing organic debris.

Mitigation measures may be considered to reduce benthic mortality and encourage redevelopment and habitat restoration. These include the use of sediments with similar composition and characteristics as native sediments to promote redevelopment, as well as the removal and replacement of endangered or sensitive organisms and habitats.

Following remediation work, short- and long-term monitoring must be carried out to ensure site restoration.

References

Author and update

Composed by : Bruno Vallée M.Sc, LVM Inc.

Updated by : Ashley Hosier, P.Eng. Royal Military College of Canada

Updated Date : February 3, 2017

Latest update provided by : Juliette Primard, Frédéric Gagnon and Sylvain Hains. WSP Canada Inc.

Latest update date :March 31, 2024

Version:
1.2.7.1