Fact sheet: Permeable Passive/Reactive Barriers — in situ

From: Public Services and Procurement Canada

On this page

Description

A permeable reactive/passive barrier consists of reactive materials placed in the ground, downgradient of the dissolved contamination enclave and generally perpendicular to the direction of groundwater flow, with the intent that contaminated groundwater will pass through the reactive materials for treatment. Contaminants that pass through the permeable reactive/passive barrier will be adsorbed, degraded, or converted to non-toxic or reduced toxicity compounds.

The reactive/passive barrier can be installed permanently or temporarily. Barrier materials can be adsorbents such as peat and granular activated carbon, biodegradation enhancers such as oxygen release compounds, or chelating agents or zero-valent iron that cause the transformation of contaminants into non-toxic or immobile species.

Many installation techniques are possible to create a permeable reactive/passive barrier. The two main ones are the excavation of a trench and the installation of reactive materials and their injection through injection wells or other injection techniques used in drilling.

Reactive/passive permeable barriers are often proposed as an alternative to pump and treat groundwater remediation technology. Ideally, the systems are passive and require very little regular maintenance following installation. 

Sources:

Implementation of the technology

Reactive/passive barrier technology can include:

  • mobilization, site access, and the establishment of temporary facilities;
  • the construction of the barrier (trench or borehole) and the installation of the reactive materials;
  • the establishment of one or more parallel or serial treatment areas, if applicable;
  • the installation of impermeable walls (sheet pile wall, impermeable mud wall, in-situ soil-cement mix) or high-permeability subsurface drains to channel contaminated groundwater to the treatment area, if applicable

Note:

In some cases, barriers will need to be excavated at the end of their useful life. This may be necessary, for example, for the replacement of reactive materials.    

Materials and Storage

On-site storage may include reactive materials and injection system, if applicable, fuels, lubricants, and other site materials required for the operation of machinery or equipment to implement the process. Other materials required for the development of the process area may be stored on site during construction. Once the systems are installed, little or no material is kept on site unless the system requires an active component, such as an oxygen diffuser or an amendment injection system (hydrogen peroxide, nutrients).

Residues and Discharges

Potentially contaminated soils will need to be disposed of properly when excavation is required and soils are replaced with reactive barrier materials or when injection wells are installed. Treated groundwater flows out of the treatment area hydraulically downstream and may contain residual contaminants.

Some processes within the barriers may generate releases. For example, some biological processes may release methane or hydrogen sulphide; systems with active air diffusers may cause some degree of in situ volatilization of volatile contaminants, which are then released to the atmosphere.

Recommended analyses for detailed characterization

Chemical analysis

  • pH
  • Contaminant concentrations present in the following phases:
    • dissolved
    • free
  • Redox potential
  • Total and dissolved organic matter content
  • Concentration of compounds or materials that react with the reactive material, including:
    • Metals (total and dissolved)
    • Carbonates
    • Sulphur
    • Nitrogenous compounds

Physical analysis

  • Dissolved oxygen concentration
  • Soil granulometry

Recommended trials for detailed characterization

None.

Other information recommended for detailed characterization

Phase II

  • Contaminant delineation (area and depth)
  • Presence of potential environmental receptors
  • Presence of above and below ground infrastructure
  • Nature and stratigraphy of the soil

Phase III

  • Identification of preferential pathways for contaminant migration
  • Characterization of the hydrogeological system including:
    • the direction and speed of the groundwater flow
    • the hydraulic conductivity
    • the seasonal fluctuations
    • the hydraulic gradient

Notes:

Preliminary tests, treatability tests and a pilot test may be required to evaluate:

  • Optimal reagent formula according to the type of contaminant and the groundwater geochemistry;
  • Oxygen demand (if the treatment is biological);
  • Reagent injection rates;
  • Operating pressures and flow rates for systems complementary to the barrier (e.g., for continuous injection systems or vapour recovery systems);
  • Optimal dimensions (shape, thickness, width, depth);
  • Residence time of the contaminants in the barrier to ensure their treatment;
  • Quality of discharges associated with the process, such as the generation of by-products of reaction, if any;
  • Hydrogeological properties of the aquifer

Applications

Reactive/passive barrier technology is applicable in both low and high permeability aquifers and preferably in relatively homogeneous environments. However, the installation of the barrier by excavation may be limited by depth and rock. Under these conditions, a reactive zone can be established by injecting the reactive materials via injection wells.

Applications to sites in northern regions

  • The technology is applicable in northern environments; however, remote sites require greater mobilization, resulting in higher on-site supervision costs. In addition, equipment availability is limited and work windows are relatively short.
  • This technology can be used in remote locations without services or electricity.
  • Telemetry can be used for distant monitoring of site conditions.

Treatment type

Treatment type
Treatment typeApplies or Does not apply
In situ
Applies
Ex situ
Does not apply
Biological
Applies
Chemical
Applies
Control
Does not exist
Dissolved contamination
Applies
Free Phase
Does not exist
Physical
Applies
Residual contamination
Does not exist
Resorption
Applies
Thermal
Does not exist

State of technology

State of technology
State of technologyExist or Does not exist
Testing
Exist
Commercialization
Exist

Target contaminants

Target contaminantsApplies, Does not apply or With restrictions
Aliphatic chlorinated hydrocarbons
Applies
Chlorobenzenes
Applies
Explosives
Does not apply
Metals
Applies
Monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
Applies
Non metalic inorganic compounds
Applies
Pesticides
Does not apply
Petroleum hydrocarbons
Applies
Phenolic compounds
Applies
Policyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
Applies
Polychlorinated biphenyls
Does not apply

Treatment time

Treatment time
Treatment timeApplies or Does not apply
Less than 1 year
Does not apply
1 to 3 years
Does not apply
3 to 5 years
Does not apply
More than 5 years
Applies

Notes:

The treatment time can be very long and even indefinite. As long as the source of contamination is present and active, the barrier may be required.

Long-term considerations (following remediation work)

Since the barrier may be required for a long period of time or indefinitely, regular groundwater quality monitoring activities upstream and hydraulically downstream of the barrier should be maintained to verify barrier performance.

The consumption of reactive materials can lead to a decrease in efficiency over time. Also, a reduction in the permeability of the barrier may occur over time (fouling, precipitation, clogging). These phenomena will reduce its performance. A replacement or a cleaning may then be required.

Secondary by-products and/or metabolites

Generally, this technology does not generate secondary products. Nevertheless, it can modify the conditions encountered in soils where certain compounds can be transformed into toxic substances, for example. The by-products depend on the contaminants, the reactive materials and the characteristics of the groundwater. For example, the processing of chlorinated solvents can result in the creation of dichloroethylene and/or vinyl chloride

Limitations and Undesirable Effects of the Technology

  • This technology may be limited by the depth of contamination, soil heterogeneity and the presence of underground infrastructures.
  • There is a risk that some of the contaminants will pass through the barrier untreated or that some contaminants will not pass through the reactive zone.
  • The permeability of the reactive barrier may decrease over time due to precipitation of metals and/or adsorption of particles onto the reactive materials.
  • The installation costs of this technology make it less advantageous for the treatment of small volumes of contamination.
  • The installation of the reactive barrier can significantly alter the natural flow of groundwater.  

Complementary technologies that improve treatment effectiveness

Impermeable barriers can be used to direct groundwater to a reactive/passive barrier of limited size for treatment. In addition, reactive barriers can be used in conjunction with other in situ treatment technologies, such as non-aqueous phase immiscible liquid recovery, a groundwater recirculation system to increase the residence time of contaminants in the barrier.

Required secondary treatments

A system for the recovery and treatment of vapour emissions may be required.

Application examples

The following links provide application examples:

Performance

Several studies and demonstrations have proven the effectiveness of permeable reactive/passive barriers in reducing contamination to remediation goals with efficiency greater than 95%.

Measures to improve sustainability or promote ecological remediation

  • Consideration for locally available and/or recycled materials in system design.
  • Use of biological walls (bio-wall), where appropriate.
  • Optimization of the wall configuration (funnel and window) to reduce the amount of reactive materials required.
  • Limiting the number of field visits by using telemetry for distant monitoring of site conditions.
  • Assessment of the source of reagents (such as, supply chains in the manufacturing process).
  • Use of uncontaminated groundwater for preparation of chemical solutions on site, if applicable.
  • Examination of the possibilities for the transport of reagents to reduce greenhouse gases.
  • Use of the TRIAD approach for the planning and execution of site characterization steps to optimize characterization efforts and reduce the environmental footprint of this work.
  • Technology implementation and restoration of the site that optimizes the protection of ecological habitats and/or improves the quality of these habitats.

Potential impacts of the application of the technology on human health

Unavailable for this fact sheet

References

Author and update

Composed by : Mélanie Bathalon, B.Sc, MCEBR

Updated by : Jennifer Holdner, M.Sc., Public Works Government Services Canada

Updated Date : April 29, 2014

Latest update provided by : Nathalie Arel ing., M.Sc., Frédéric Gagnon CPI., Sylvain Hains ing., M.Sc., Golder Associates Ltd.

Updated Date : March 21, 2022

Version:
1.2.5