Fact sheet: Soil Mixing — Biological Process — In Situ

From: Public Services and Procurement Canada

On this page

Description

Soil mixing (biological process) is a remediation technology used for the treatment of contaminated surface soils (ideally less than 4 metres below the ground surface) impacted with organic compounds. This technology is mainly applicable to soil in the unsaturated zone.

This technology consists of periodic mixing of the contaminated soils to provide the required amendments to support and stimulate the biodegradation processes of organic contaminants. Volatilization can occur during the mixing process, although this is not the objective of the technology.

To promote the biodegradation of contaminants, the addition of amendments, fertilizers or structuring agents to stimulate microbial activity (nutrients), improve aeration, adjust pH and/or control soil water content may be necessary. These amendments are generally injected into the soil in the form of a slurry but can also be mixed into the soil in solid form using augers, which also serve to homogenize the soil/amendment mixture.

Modifications of this technology can be applied, such as the installation of air injection wells to provide an additional, constant supply of air to aerobic microorganisms.

Soil mixing can be combined with other remediation technologies, such as steam extraction with air injection (ambient or hot), solidification and stabilization, chemical reduction (zerovalent iron), and/or chemical oxidation.

Internet links:

Implementation of the technology

Implementation of this technology may include:

  • Mobilization, site access and installation of temporary facilities
  • Capture and relocation of aquatic organisms and fauna, if possible, located in the rehabilitation area. See activities involving species at risk
  • Installation of amendment preparation equipment
  • Installation of mixing and/or injection equipment
  • Realization of boreholes or mixing zones
  • Installation of equipment needed for the complementary technology, if applicable
  • Installation of vapour and gas recovery and treatment systems, if required
  • Implementation of a monitoring program, including the installation of monitoring wells downgradient from the treatment area to assess the ongoing performance and success of the technology
  • Site restoration (grading, revegetation, etc.)

Materials and Storage

On-site storage may include fuels, lubricants and other site materials required for operating the machinery and equipment for the implementation of the technology.

Soil mixing is carried out using specialized machinery that may require special installation conditions.

Depending on the type of contaminant to be treated, amendments may also be stored on-site. If a complementary technology is used, materials and storage related to this technology can be stored on-site.

When vapour and/or water treatment components and treatment systems are incorporated into the technology or if water is to be contained in watertight containers, they may also be stored on-site.

Waste and Discharge

Soil mixing (a biological process) produces little waste and no discharge in general. However, waste could be generated if soil mixing is combined with a complementary technology.

Excess soil may be generated depending on the mass and volume of amendments added and the final slope and compaction requirements.

Vapour discharge may be released from equipment exhaust or the volatilization of contaminants present in the soils. Workers who find themselves in the potential presence of odours or volatile compounds must take precautions to prevent gas emanations by monitoring concentrations, using adequate personal protective equipment and/or by conducting soil mixing work in colder temperatures. On some sites, soil dewatering may be necessary depending on mixing depth, hydraulic conductivity and the type and extent of contaminants and reagents/amendments. Dewatering water may need to be treated before discharge into the environment or collected in containers and disposed of off-site.

Recommended analyses for detailed characterization

Biological analysis

  • Total heterotrophic and specific bacterial counts (according to the contaminants of interest)

Chemical analysis

  • pH
  • Alkalinity
  • Organic carbon content
  • Contaminant concentrations present in the following phases:
    • adsorbed
    • dissolved
    • free
  • Nutrient concentrations including:
    • ammonia nitrogen
    • nitrates
    • nitrites
    • total phosphorus
    • organic nitrogen
    • potassium
  • Groundwater biodegradation indicators (dissolved oxygen, nitrate, sulfate, dissolved iron, methane)
  • Groundwater quality upstream, downstream and in the vicinity of the pollution source if stabilized soils are put back in place:
    • Nature and concentrations of contaminants
    • pH
    • Dissolved oxygen
    • Temperature
    • Electrical conductivity
    • Total organic carbon content

Physical analysis

  • Soil water content
  • Soil granulometry
  • Contaminant physical characteristics including:
    • viscosity
    • density
    • solubility
    • vapour pressure
    • Volatility
  • Presence of light or dense immiscible liquids
  • Assessment of biological conditions and ecological factors such as habitat sensitivity, presence of protected areas, presence of species at risk
  • Porosity
  • Soil geotechnical properties (bulk density, plasticity, shear strength and cohesion)
  • Permeability

Recommended trials for detailed characterization

Biological trials

  • Conducting laboratory tests to verify the efficiency of biodegradation
  • Respirometry tests to measure in situ biodegradation rates

Physical trials

  • Vapour survey
  • Evaluation of optimal mixing rates
  • Treatability tests to assess potential amendments’ performance and select the optimized rate

Hydrogeological trials

  • Permeability test

Other information recommended for detailed characterization

Phase II

  • Presence of above and below ground infrastructure
  • The risk of off-site migration
  • Nature of the contamination (chemical composition, solubility, vapour pressure, partition coefficient)
  • Contamination depth and extent
  • Presence of known and potential receptors
  • Assessment of the biological conditions and ecological factors such as habitat vulnerability, presence of protected areas, presence of species at risk

Phase III

  • Soil stratigraphy
  • Identification of preferential pathways for contaminant migration
  • Volume of contaminated material to treat
  • Characterization of the hydrogeological system including:
    • the hydraulic conductivity
    • the seasonal fluctuations
    • the hydraulic gradient
    • Groundwater and surface water flow direction
  • Hydrogeological modelling
  • Hydraulic tests to evaluate dewatering flows, if necessary
  • Contaminant mass balance

Notes:

Depending on the selected amendments and complementary technologies, it may be necessary to evaluate the impact of products on several chemical and physical parameters, such as hydraulic conductivity, leaching potential, load-bearing capacity, etc.

Applications

The technology is particularly well suited when the site has a small surface area and the targeted soils are superficial and easy to reach. Soil mixing is generally used for organic contaminants in low-permeability soils where in situ bioremediation cannot be applied. For the technology to be effective, soil conditions must meet the following criteria:

  • Water content must be maintained between 40% and 85% of the total soil water holding capacity.
  • The number of microorganisms should be maintained above 103 CFU/g (Colony Forming Units/gram soil).
  • The potential of hydrogen (pH) must be maintained between 6 and 8 to facilitate bacterial growth and activity.
  • The optimal soil temperature to sustain microbial activity is between 10 °C and 45 °C.

Applications to sites in northern regions

  • The technology is applicable in northern environments, but remote sites have greater logistical challenges associated with mobilization, resulting in higher costs. In addition, equipment availability is limited and the seasonal windows to conduct work are short.
  • Monitoring and testing are limited by timely access to certified laboratories, and often necessitate the development of on-site testing and analysis of materials, the implementation of progressive interventions and/or implementation of a risk-based management approach.
  • Cold climates generally have a negative impact on contaminant biodegradation processes—the half-life of contaminants will be longer than in temperate climates.
  • Homogeneous soil mixing can be challenging if frost has penetrated deep into the soil.
  • Northern environment conditions could limit the use of complementary technologies to soil mixing.

 

Treatment type

Treatment type
Treatment typeApplies or Does not apply
In situ
Applies
Ex situ
Does not apply
Biological
Applies
Chemical
Does not exist
Control
Does not exist
Dissolved contamination
Does not exist
Free Phase
Does not exist
Physical
Applies
Residual contamination
Applies
Resorption
Applies
Thermal
Does not exist

State of technology

State of technology
State of technologyExist or Does not exist
Testing
Does not exist
Commercialization
Exist

Target contaminants

Target contaminantsApplies, Does not apply or With restrictions
Aliphatic chlorinated hydrocarbons
With restrictions
Chlorobenzenes
With restrictions
Explosives
Does not apply
Metals
Does not apply
Monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
With restrictions
Non metalic inorganic compounds
Does not apply
Pesticides
Applies
Petroleum hydrocarbons
Applies
Phenolic compounds
With restrictions
Policyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
Applies
Polychlorinated biphenyls
Does not apply

Notes:

Monocyclic Aromatic Compounds: the technology applies with restrictions as they are mostly volatilized before being biodegraded.

Treatment time

Treatment time
Treatment timeApplies or Does not apply
Less than 1 year
Applies
1 to 3 years
Applies
3 to 5 years
Applies
More than 5 years
Does not apply

Long-term considerations (following remediation work)

Soil mixing operations have a potential impact on wildlife and aquatic habitats, as well as on the organisms present, especially on species at risk. Documentation of recovery may require long-term monitoring of the site.

Depending on the contaminants, amendments and complementary technologies in place, a monitoring program, including soil sampling, may be required to assess the treatment’s performance, evaluate the need to add amendments, and ensure the performance of complementary treatments, if applicable.

Long-term performance surveillance can include groundwater quality monitoring by installing monitoring wells downgradient from the treatment area to ensure the absence of contamination lixiviation and the ongoing performance success of the technology. Long-term monitoring can also include an assessment of the physical integrity of the disturbed area and the preservation of its geotechnical properties over time. The integrity of the disturbed soil zone can also be validated by long-term monitoring of gaseous emissions. In addition, long-term monitoring may require periodic respirometry tests to measure the evolution of in situ biodegradation rates over time.

Secondary by-products and/or metabolites

Generally, biodegradation of organic contaminants does not generate any deleterious secondary by-products or metabolites. For example, the biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons generates harmless products for the environment and human health, such as carbon dioxide and water.

However, toxic intermediate degradation by-products may be generated depending on the site conditions and the contaminant characteristics. Furthermore, the biodegradation processes may lead to changes in the geochemical conditions and increase the mobility of some chemical parameters.

It should be noted that mixing contaminated soils promotes the volatilization of volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds.

Additionally, if a complementary technology is selected, by-products can be generated.

Limitations and Undesirable Effects of the Technology

  • Soil mixing (biological process) is not appropriate in the following situations:
    • Locations with limited access to the surface to be treated
    • Contaminated soils located below buildings or other infrastructure
    • Contamination is located in permeable soils below the water table. Soils must be well drained and able to maintain a water content between 40% and 85% of the total water-holding capacity
  • Soil mixing (biological process) is challenging under the following conditions:
    • Contaminated soils deeper than 4 metres (soil mixing efficiency is limited below 4 m although possible down to 20m below ground surface)
    • Dense soil or the presence of boulders restricting mixing capacity
    • High concentrations of specific substances (such as heavy metals) can be toxic to microorganisms
    • Climate can hamper the control of the treatment conditions
    • For petroleum hydrocarbons, it is difficult to reduce concentrations more than 95% and/or obtain residual concentrations below 0.1 mg/kg
  • Soil mixing (biological process) can have the following adverse effects:
    • Volatile organic compounds may impact air quality
    • Emission of dust during soil mixing and handling
    • Access and traffic constraints in the treatment area

Complementary technologies that improve treatment effectiveness

  • Soil heating to maintain optimal temperature to support biodegradation processes.
  • Volatile emission collection and treatment, if needed.

Required secondary treatments

Soil mixing (biological process) can be combined with different in situ soil treatment technologies depending on the site’s specific characteristics and contamination. The following technologies are the most commonly applied simultaneously with soil mixing:

Application examples

Application examples are available at these links:

Performance

The treatment time required for site remediation with soil mixing (biological process) varies according to the type of contaminants and their concentrations (and the required reduction rate), the density and type of native microbial populations, and the physical and chemical properties of the soil.

Monitoring during remediation should be carried out after each soil mixing operation. This will allow assessment of the effectiveness of the soil mixing in meeting the remediation project’s requirements and objectives.

Measures to improve sustainability or promote ecological remediation

  • Using renewable energy and energy-efficient equipment for technology implementation.
  • Reducing fuel consumption (and using renewable energy where available) for vehicles and heavy machinery.
  • Selecting locally produced amendments.
  • Optimizing the scheduling to promote resource sharing and reduce the number of mobilization days.
  • Capturing and relocating the species at risk and sensitive habitats likely affected by rehabilitation work.
  • Implementing a monitoring program, including the construction of monitoring wells downgradient from the treatment area, to ensure the absence of contamination lixiviation and the technology’s ongoing performance success.
  • Implementing mitigation measures to minimize potential impacts caused by vapour, dust and leachate.

Potential impacts of the application of the technology on human health

The minor and major potential human health exposure pathways are presented in the following table.

 

Exposure Pathway Triggers (Remediation Stages)

Residency or Transport Media

Public Exposure Routes (On-Site and Off-Site)

Monitoring

Mitigation Measures according to Residency or Transport Media

 

Site preparation

 

Stockpiling, loading, and unloading of amendments

 

Soil mixing

Dust

Inhalation of Dust

Dust Monitoring

Dust

  • Limit equipment speed.
  • Limit equipment movements during dry, windy periods.
  • Water mist on dry materials.
  • Cover stockpile and use water and/or chemical amendments.
  • Mitigate effects as close to the source as possible.
  • Monitoring at the source, the installation limit and/or the receptor level.
  • Train personnel about safety and provide them with personal protective equipment and appropriate emergency equipment (such as eyewash stations).
  • Selection of nontoxic amendments wherever possible.
  • Monitor measures in place for safe storage and handling to minimize exposure, as outlined in material safety data sheets.

Vapours

  • Limit open work and storage areas, cover stockpiles.
  • Temporary emission control structures.
  • Capture of vapours at the source and treatment.
  • Wear personal protective equipment (vapour protection mask).

Contaminated soils

  • Vehicle cleaning station at site exit.

Surface water

  • Install fence, limit site use and signage.
  • Cover stockpiles.
  • Monitor particles migration in surface water.
  • Collect and treat contaminated water
  • Implement stormwater management plan.

Groundwater

  • Institutional controls.

Animals and Plants

  • Wash food before consumption.
  • Do not irrigate or use treated water for irrigation.
  • Stakeholder engagement.
  • Install fence, limit site use and signage.
  • Institutional controls.

Vapours

Inhalation of Vapours

Air Quality Monitoring

Animals and Plants (including fish, shellfish, and wildlife)

Country Foods Consumption

Surface Water Monitoring

Animal and Plant Tissue Monitoring

Groundwater (migration/leaching of contaminants and amendments)

Ingestion of Drinking Water

Groundwater Monitoring

Surface water (amendment run-off)

Dermal Contact

Incidental Ingestion

Surface Water Monitoring

 

Contaminated Soils

Incidental Ingestion

Dermal Contact

Country Foods Consumption

Animal and Plant Tissue Monitoring

Surface Water Monitoring

Groundwater Monitoring

References

Author and update

Composed by : Magalie Turgeon and Karine Drouin, M.Sc. National Research Council Canada.

Latest update provided by : Frédérick de Oliveira, Frédéric Gagnon and Sylvain Hains. WSP Canada Inc.

Latest update date :March 31, 2024

Version:
1.2.7.1