Fact sheet: Impermeable walls

From: Public Services and Procurement Canada

On this page

Description

Impermeable walls are installed by excavating a deep trench and replacing the soil with impermeable or low hydraulic conductivity materials. Impermeable walls are not a treatment technology, but are generally used to limit the migration of contaminants. They can also be used to isolate a source of contamination to prevent the dispersion of contaminants to groundwater. Thus, impermeable walls may surround the contamination or be constructed hydraulically upstream or downstream of the contamination. These walls are used to contain the contaminated groundwater, to redirect it, or to act as a barrier during the implementation of an in situ treatment system.

The materials used to form a wall may be a mixture including bentonite, bentonite cement, bentonite pozzolan, attapulgite, organically modified bentonite, or a slurry geotextile that has a low permeability and a chemical resistant barrier.

To increase the effectiveness of a wall of this type, it is preferable that the base of the wall penetrates a layer of low-permeability geological material, such as a layer of clay that extends to the contact with sound rock.

Sources:

Implementation of the technology

The technology of an impermeable wall can include:

  • mobilization, site access, and the installation of temporary facilities;
  • the excavation of the trench for the installation of the wall;
  • stabilization and backfilling of the trench with impermeable materials;
  • if volatile compounds are present, or if there is a risk of vapour generation, then a vapour collection and treatment system may be required;
  • the establishment of a network of wells to monitor groundwater quality.

Materials and Storage

On-site storage may include impermeable materials, fuels, lubricants and other site materials required for the operation of machinery or equipment for the process. When walls are built, little material is kept on site unless the system requires an active component such as a treatment system.

Residues and Discharges

This technology does not produce any residues other than the soils that were excavated for the placement of the walls. Soils excavated to create the trench may be contaminated and therefore will need to be treated or disposed of.

Recommended analyses for detailed characterization

Physical analysis

  • Presence of light or dense immiscible liquids

Recommended trials for detailed characterization

Hydrogeological trials

  • Permeability test
  • Pumping trials
  • Tracer tests

Notes:

Tests examining the effect of temperature change on hydraulic conductivity and establishing the zone of freezing with a pilot scale tubing system are recommended to properly design the full-scale containment system.

Other information recommended for detailed characterization

Phase II

  • Presence of potential environmental receptors
  • Presence of above and below ground infrastructure
  • Characterization and delimitation of the extent of contamination in groundwater
  • Soil lithologies and stratigraphy

Notes:

Preliminary or treatability testing and pilot testing may be required to evaluate the permeability and the compatibility of the wall materials with contaminants, water and vapours.

Applications

The installation of impermeable walls is applicable to the majority of dissolved contaminants that migrate into groundwater, as long as the contaminants do not restrict the occupancy of the environment, the quality of the environment and the life of living organisms in the long term. Furthermore, the technology is effective in the presence of porous, fractured and homogeneous soils.

Applications to sites in northern regions

  • Implementing impermeable walls is achievable in northern environments, however, remote sites require greater mobilization, resulting in higher installation costs. In addition, equipment availability is limited and work windows are relatively short.
  • The impermeable walls can be used in remote locations, without services or electricity.
  • Impermeable walls have significant advantages over conventional groundwater treatment systems in remote and northern areas where there is no access to utilities or a local workforce to operate and maintain them.

Treatment type

Treatment type
Treatment typeApplies or Does not apply
In situ
Applies
Ex situ
Does not apply
Biological
Does not exist
Chemical
Does not exist
Control
Applies
Dissolved contamination
Applies
Free Phase
Applies
Physical
Applies
Residual contamination
Does not exist
Resorption
Does not exist
Thermal
Does not exist

State of technology

State of technology
State of technologyExist or Does not exist
Testing
Does not exist
Commercialization
Exist

Target contaminants

Target contaminantsApplies, Does not apply or With restrictions
Aliphatic chlorinated hydrocarbons
Applies
Chlorobenzenes
Applies
Explosives
Applies
Metals
Applies
Monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
Applies
Non metalic inorganic compounds
Applies
Pesticides
Applies
Petroleum hydrocarbons
Applies
Phenolic compounds
Applies
Policyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
Applies
Polychlorinated biphenyls
Applies

Treatment time

Treatment time
Treatment timeApplies or Does not apply
Less than 1 year
Does not apply
1 to 3 years
Does not apply
3 to 5 years
Does not apply
More than 5 years
Applies

Notes:

The period for which the impermeable wall is kept in place can be very long and even indefinite. As long as the source of contamination is present, the presence of the impermeable wall may be required.

Long-term considerations (following remediation work)

Impermeable walls can deteriorate over time and allow contaminated groundwater to migrate. A monitoring network for surrounding groundwater and off-gas migration is often required.

In addition, activities carried out on the site, or its uses, must not compromise the integrity of the wall.

Secondary by-products and/or metabolites

The impermeable wall does not produce secondary products.

Limitations and Undesirable Effects of the Technology

  • Impermeable walls are used for contamination containment and do not treat contaminants.
  • Low permeability mixtures can be sensitive to pH, salinity and the type of water contamination.
  • Covering the confined area may be required to reduce infiltration of runoff and precipitation into the soils.
  • The impermeable wall may alter the hydraulic flow of groundwater on a scale that may exceed the site or confined area.
  • The installation of impermeable walls may create restrictions on the use of the site. The integrity of the impermeable wall may diminish over time and result in the risk of contaminated water or vapour migration.

Complementary technologies that improve treatment effectiveness

  • A permeable reactive barrier or water treatment system can be added to treat the contamination, in addition to containing it.
  • Installation of a pumping system to recirculate/control the water around the wall.
  • In some cases, containment by impermeable walls is accompanied by capping of the overlying soil to reduce upward migration of vapours (if any) from the soil, percolation of precipitation, and leaching of contaminants into the groundwater. .

Required secondary treatments

Impermeable walls do not treat contamination. They are a contamination containment measure. Treatment of source area contaminants by in situ or ex situ technologies may be required.

Application examples

The following links provide application examples:

Performance

Impermeable walls have been used for several decades as a mitigation strategy and as a means to control long-term contamination migration. These walls are 95% effective in containing uncontaminated groundwater. However, in the presence of contaminated groundwater, certain types of contaminants can degrade the wall’s components and thus reduce its long-term effectiveness.

Measures to improve sustainability or promote ecological remediation

  • Use of renewable energy and energy-efficient equipment for the installation of the walls.
  • Limiting the number of field visits by using telemetry for remote monitoring of site conditions.
  • If soil capping is necessary, consider capping systems that use soil amendments and vegetation.
  • Use of the TRIAD approach for the planning and execution of site characterization steps in order to optimize characterization efforts and reduce the ecological footprint of this work.

Potential impacts of the application of the technology on human health

Unavailable for this fact sheet

References

Author and update

Composed by : Josée Thibodeau, M.Sc, National Research Council

Updated by : Jennifer Holdner, M.Sc., Public Works Government Services Canada

Updated Date : April 30, 2014

Latest update provided by : Nathalie Arel ing., M.Sc., Frédéric Gagnon CPI., Sylvain Hains ing., M.Sc., Golder Associates Ltd.

Updated Date : March 24, 2022

Version:
1.2.4