Fact sheet: Chemical oxidation with permanganate—ex situ

From: Public Services and Procurement Canada

On this page

Description

Ex situ chemical oxidation using permanganate requires excavation and homogenization of soils and excavated sludge, or pumping of groundwater as well as the management of soil, sludge or water after treatment. Permanganate is one of the most commonly used and best-known chemical oxidants. It allows the complete or partial destruction of organic contaminants.

Permanganate is available in liquid or salt form. Potassium permanganate is the most common form of salt. In addition, calcium and magnesium salts are also used. The salts are dissolved in water prior to their addition to the soil, sludge or water to be treated. Permanganate oxidation is effective under pH conditions ranging from 3.5 to 12, but the specific oxidation reaction is pH dependent.

Source:

4.16 Chemical Reduction/Oxidation—FRTR Remediation Technologies Screening Matrix and Reference Guide, Version 4.0

Implementation of the technology

For the treatment of groundwater, extraction structures are put in place to collect contaminated groundwater and convey it to the treatment system, where it is treated and discarded.

The implementation of this technology may include:

  • Mobilization, access to the site and temporary facilities.
  • The construction of wells, collection trenches or the installation of permeable drains.
  • The installation of pumps and supply lines (often underground or in trenches designed to resist freezing and sheltered from traffic).
  • Installation of a treatment system (mixing tank, oxidation system, etc.) (May require a small building or container.)
  • The installation of a discharge system (evacuation to existing pipes, new surface water outlets, reinjection, infiltration field or infiltration basin).

For the treatment of contaminated soil, conventional excavation equipment is used to remove or mix the contaminated soil for on-site treatment. This can include:

  • Mobilization, access to the site and setting up temporary facilities.
  • Temporary storage and mixing of soils to ensure an even distribution of the soils to be treated.
  • Adding additives to increase soil porosity.
  • Treated soil management (off-site disposal, on-site application or backfilling of excavated areas).
  • The restoration of the soil surface.
  • Controls may be required for vapour and gaseous effluents if the contaminants in the treated soil or groundwater are volatile.

Materials and Storage

  • This technology is implemented using traditional methods and equipment that are commonly available for excavation or development of wells, trenches or drains.
  • Treatment units can be built on-site or pre-assembled and transported in shipping containers, trailers or on pallets.
  • Treatment equipment requires the installation of an energy source
  • Permanganates in solid or liquid form should be stored safely in closed and compatible containers at room temperature and away from heat or incompatible materials.
  • The separation and confinement of these products are very important. Permanganate dust, which can be a health hazard, must be controlled during handling.
  • In some cases, the reaction between reagents and contaminants, including unexploded ordnance and explosives, is sufficient to cause combustion.

Residues and Discharges

The implementation of the groundwater treatment system could lead to the management of contaminated soils resulting from drilling or excavation activities. In this case, these soils must be removed off-site.

The complete mineralization of organic compounds produces carbon dioxide, water and inorganic ions (such as chloride). In some cases, complete mineralization doesn’t occur and contaminant residues can remain in the soil.

Potassium permanganate produces high levels of sodium or potassium and precipitates of manganese dioxide (because of the state of oxidation, dissolved manganese is not usually a problem, but this can be confirmed by means of environmental monitoring).

Treated groundwater typically meets applicable criteria and doesn’t pose a high risk when discharged. However, water quality monitoring is performed prior to discharge to ensure no unacceptable levels of by-products, reagents, or pH remain in the water.

Treated soils must be analyzed for conformity before reuse.

Recommended analyses for detailed characterization

Chemical analysis

  • pH
  • Organic matter content
  • Metals concentrations
  • Concentration of oxidant-consuming substances includes:
    • natural organic matter not considering the contaminants
    • reduced minerals
    • carbonate
    • other free radical scavengers
  • Contaminant concentrations present in the following phases:
    • adsorbed
    • dissolved

Physical analysis

  • Soil water content
  • Soil granulometry
  • Soil buffering capacity

Recommended trials for detailed characterization

Chemical trials

  • Evaluation of the matrix oxidant demand

Notes:

On-site treatment trials will establish the efficiency of the technology and the parameters that influence the treatment time and cost (e.g. residence time, pump flow rate, requirements for pre-treatment, etc.).

  • Laboratory treatability testing (dosage)
  • Physical trials

    • Evaluation of optimal mixing rates

    Other information recommended for detailed characterization

    Phase III

    • Volume of contaminated material to treat
    • Volume or flow of water to be treated

    Applications

    • Treatment of soils accessible by excavation.
    • Treatment of pumped groundwater.
    • Treatment of halogenated or non-halogenated volatile or semi-volatile organic compounds, petroleum hydrocarbons and pesticides.

    Applies to the degradation of chlorinated compounds, such as perchloroethylene, trichloroethylene, dichloroethylene and vinyl chloride, as well as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.

    Applications to sites in northern regions

    Application of this technology in a northern region may be difficult because of the monitoring that such a system requires. For remote sites, this implies greater mobilization and higher on-site monitoring costs. The availability of equipment is limited and requires additional mobilization. Work windows are relatively short considering that this technology involves either excavation of the soil or pumping of groundwater. These two activities, as well as the handling of soil or water up to the treatment unit could require additional effort and cost at low temperatures and there is a risk of freezing.

    Treatment type

    Treatment type
    Treatment typeApplies or Does not apply
    In situ
    Does not apply
    Ex situ
    Applies
    Biological
    Does not exist
    Chemical
    Applies
    Control
    Does not exist
    Dissolved contamination
    Does not exist
    Free Phase
    Does not exist
    Physical
    Does not exist
    Residual contamination
    Applies
    Resorption
    Applies
    Thermal
    Does not exist

    State of technology

    State of technology
    State of technologyExist or Does not exist
    Testing
    Does not exist
    Commercialization
    Exist

    Target contaminants

    Target contaminantsApplies, Does not apply or With restrictions
    Aliphatic chlorinated hydrocarbons
    With restrictions
    Chlorobenzenes
    Does not apply
    Explosives
    With restrictions
    Metals
    With restrictions
    Monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
    With restrictions
    Non metalic inorganic compounds
    Does not apply
    Pesticides
    With restrictions
    Petroleum hydrocarbons
    Applies
    Phenolic compounds
    Applies
    Policyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
    Applies
    Polychlorinated biphenyls
    Does not apply

    Treatment time

    Treatment time
    Treatment timeApplies or Does not apply
    Less than 1 year
    Applies
    1 to 3 years
    Applies
    3 to 5 years
    Does not apply
    More than 5 years
    Does not apply

    Long-term considerations (following remediation work)

    Following soil treatment, whether used for backfilling excavations or for imported materials, environmental and geotechnical control of materials must be performed to ensure that soils do not exceed the applicable criteria for the site and do not create problems in terms of geotechnical stability or differential settlement.

    Secondary by-products and/or metabolites

    Chemical oxidation of organic compounds by permanganate produces carbon dioxide. Obtaining toxic by-products may be of concern in the event of incomplete reactions. Laboratory tests and/or pilot tests, as well as strict quality control of the injected reagents may be required. Products resulting from oxidation treatment are generally (but not always) less toxic, more mobile and more biodegradable than their precursors.

    Limitations and Undesirable Effects of the Technology

    • Gaseous effluents that may be produced during the oxidation of contaminants or by-products must be treated.
    • Potential for metal mobilization.
    • The presence of compounds that react with the oxidant may reduce the efficiency of the technology.
    • Costs can increase rapidly if large quantities of oxidants are required.
    • This technique requires the manipulation of noxious products. Permanganate dust must be minimized when the solid form is used.
    • High soil humidity and organic matter content reduce the effectiveness of the treatment.
    • Depth of contamination may limit excavation of soils to be treated.
    • Infrastructure (aboveground or underground) can prevent soil excavation, eliminating the ex situ treatment option.
    • Ex situ treatment costs may be higher than in situ treatment costs because of increased handling of the contaminated material.
    • Dust control may be required during manipulation of excavated soils
    • The oxidation reaction with permanganate may produce temporarily coloured water. This must be considered when choosing the discharge point of the treated water.

    Complementary technologies that improve treatment effectiveness

    If free phase is present, a separation process must be implemented prior to the chemical oxidation treatment of soil or groundwater.

    Required secondary treatments

    The gaseous emissions must be captured and processed. If the contaminated soils are mixed with a permanganate solution, leaching water may be generated and must be collected and processed.

    Application examples

    The following website contains application examples:

    Performance

    Chemical oxidation with permanganate is a widely proven technology that allows relatively fast treatment.

    The advantage of ex situ treatment over in situ treatment is the control of oxidation conditions (e.g. contact time) and the certainty of a homogeneous distribution of the oxidant in the contaminated material.

    Measures to improve sustainability or promote ecological remediation

    • Optimization of the calendar to promote the sharing of resources and reduce the number of days of mobilization.
    • Use of renewable energy and low-energy equipment.
    • Assessment of the oxidant source (e.g. supply chains as part of the manufacturing process).
    • Use of groundwater for the preparation of chemical solutions on the site.
    • Review of transportation methods to reduce green gases. 
    • Use of recyclable bulk solution containers, if the materials allow it. 

    Potential impacts of the application of the technology on human health

    Main Exposure Mechanisms

    Applies or Doesn’t Apply

    Monitoring and Mitigation

    Dust

    Applies for soil treatment and permanganate separation

    Monitoring conditions favourable to dispersion during the excavation of the soil to be treated.

    Atmospheric/Steam Emissions—Point Sources or Chimneys

    Applies according to the treatment system

    Integrate the collection and treatment of waste gases into the design,

    emission monitoring (choice of parameters, types of samples and intervention levels depending on source, risk and local requirements).

    Atmospheric/Steam Emissions—Non-point Sources

    Applies

    Estimation of the potential for vapour emissions, and monitoring of emissions to confirm predictions.

    Air/steam — by-products

    Applies

    Estimation of the potential for vapour emissions, and monitoring of emissions to confirm predictions.

    Runoff

    Doesn’t apply

    N/A

    Groundwater—displacement

    Applies

    Modelling and monitoring using pressure sensors

    Groundwater—chemical/ geochemical mobilization

    Doesn’t apply

    N/A

    Groundwater—by-product

    Applies

    Water quality monitoring

    Accident/Failure—damage to public services

    Applies

    File checks and licensing prior to excavation or drilling, development of excavation procedures and emergency response

    Accident/Failure—leak or spill

    Applies

    Risk review, development of accident and emergency response plans, monitoring and inspection of unsafe conditions

    Accident/Failure — fire or explosion (inflammable vapours)

    Applies

    Risk review, development of accident and emergency response plans, monitoring and inspection of unsafe conditions

    Other—Accident/Failure—migration of gases and liquids along preferential pathways

    Doesn’t apply

    N/A

    Other — Handling of contaminated soils

    Applies

    Risk review, development of accident and emergency response plans, monitoring and inspection of unsafe conditions

    References

    Author and update

    Composed by : Mélanie Bathalon, B.Sc, MCEBR

    Updated by : Karine Drouin, M.Sc., National Research Council

    Updated Date : August 17, 2017

    Latest update provided by : Nathalie Arel, P.Eng., M.Sc., Christian Gosselin, P.Eng., M.Eng. and Sylvain Hains, P.Eng., M.Sc., Golder Associés Ltée

    Updated Date : March 22, 2019

    Version:
    1.2.4